<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: presence in communication services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://purplemotes.net/2006/11/12/presence-in-communication-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://purplemotes.net/2006/11/12/presence-in-communication-services/</link>
	<description>a journal of whimsy and hope</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Louis Seguineau</title>
		<link>http://purplemotes.net/2006/11/12/presence-in-communication-services/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Louis Seguineau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://purplemotes.net/2006/11/12/presence-in-communication-services/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>You know what Douglas, I agree with you 200%! Especially on the bit where you say &quot;That would be a horrible insult to be associated with a Telco 2.0 service.&quot;

Unfortunately, you are also right suggesting that businesses will try to make money around something &quot;elusive&quot; rather than hiding presence where it belongs: in the underlying infastructure.

As for me, I always liked to understand what I was talking about. The subject of presence is so intrinsically linked to human behaviour that every step forward I make looking into it reveals a larger landscape. Discovery which is both thrilling and frightening. But isn&#039;t that the fate of any look we give at us human beings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what Douglas, I agree with you 200%! Especially on the bit where you say &#8220;That would be a horrible insult to be associated with a Telco 2.0 service.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, you are also right suggesting that businesses will try to make money around something &#8220;elusive&#8221; rather than hiding presence where it belongs: in the underlying infastructure.</p>
<p>As for me, I always liked to understand what I was talking about. The subject of presence is so intrinsically linked to human behaviour that every step forward I make looking into it reveals a larger landscape. Discovery which is both thrilling and frightening. But isn&#8217;t that the fate of any look we give at us human beings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

