Comments on: sensory ecology http://purplemotes.net/2006/05/29/sensory-ecology/ a journal of whimsy and hope Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:36:39 -0600 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Telepocalypse http://purplemotes.net/2006/05/29/sensory-ecology/comment-page-1/#comment-201 Telepocalypse Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:42:37 +0000 http://purplemotes.net/2006/05/29/sensory-ecology/#comment-201 <strong>iTnEnLoEvPaHtOiNoYn...</strong> In case you’ve ever wondered if there’s any scope for innovation in telephony (geddit?), here’s some points to ponder. First, check out this post by Douglas Galbi, in particular: Good sensory design of communication services requires ... iTnEnLoEvPaHtOiNoYn...

In case you’ve ever wondered if there’s any scope for innovation in telephony (geddit?), here’s some points to ponder. First, check out this post by Douglas Galbi, in particular: Good sensory design of communication services requires ...

]]> By: Rethink(IP) http://purplemotes.net/2006/05/29/sensory-ecology/comment-page-1/#comment-187 Rethink(IP) Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:42:14 +0000 http://purplemotes.net/2006/05/29/sensory-ecology/#comment-187 <strong>Carnival of the Capitalists - CoTC - Rethink(IP) Redux...</strong> Well, as Steve said earlier – we are at it again. Welcome the the June 5th edition of the Carnival of the Capitalists.  Lots of good things to read and plenty of information for everyone. My special thanks to Brian...... Carnival of the Capitalists - CoTC - Rethink(IP) Redux...

Well, as Steve said earlier – we are at it again. Welcome the the June 5th edition of the Carnival of the Capitalists.  Lots of good things to read and plenty of information for everyone. My special thanks to Brian......

]]> By: purple motes » history of science and business http://purplemotes.net/2006/05/29/sensory-ecology/comment-page-1/#comment-150 purple motes » history of science and business Tue, 30 May 2006 00:37:52 +0000 http://purplemotes.net/2006/05/29/sensory-ecology/#comment-150 [...] At least this is clear: good science, whether known or yet to be discovered, is not sufficient to produce a profitable new product. [...] [...] At least this is clear: good science, whether known or yet to be discovered, is not sufficient to produce a profitable new product. [...]

]]>